8 Mayıs 2014 Perşembe

acaip yoruldum ama oldu sanırsam

                                        SCHOOL UNIFORM: NECESSARY OR NOT?

      In Turkish Education System, there have been a lot of changes throughout its history   from 1924 to today, 2014. These changes can range from laws regulating the concept ”education” in general to teacher appointment, schooling, school material and so on. Education, according to universal acceptance, is knowing how to reach what one needs to know. In Turkey, authorities have always been in research of redefining this description and comprehending it properly. While doing so, they have also shaped the profile of a student in terms of how to wear at school. This is legalized by Turkish Grand National Assembly, which commands that every student should what The Education Ministry wants. As stated in the Ministry’s Regulations Booklet, under the headline “Regulations about clothes of students of schools connected to National Education Ministry (p.1, 2012), students can not wear any political emblem, carry any racist, discriminating object etc. Therefore, school uniform is much more useful when compared to other options (e.g. free wearing) thanks to its being applicable and acceptable.

    First of all, standardizing a school uniform contributes to both family’s budget and society’s point of money. In Turkey, which is regarded as developing country no matter how its institutions and statesmen say that we are among the most developed 20 countries all around the world, it is clear that there is a huge income inequality among people. While one can earn around 15,000 TL per month, some other people are forced to work under bad conditions and paid just 800 or 900 TL. Here happens to be an interesting data. In our country, Turkey, hunger limit is determined to be 1,169 TL (according to, March calculations). This inequality can be observed in many areas and also in education system. To lessen this huge gap to some extent, a standard school uniform is accepted. Families with lower income than this hunger limit and those with much more income than hunger limit are obliged to make their children wear the same in state schools to be able to go to them. This unity of wearing enables families to profit more both economically and psychologically. They do not have to buy new clothes ( like different colours or kinds of jacket, pants or shirts.). There is a common uniform that every student, regardless of his/her family income or socioeconomic status, has to wear. In addition, students can manage to diminish the totally wrong acceptance that rich students become friends with the rich or vice versa. This misconception can be destroyed, to some extent, by means of this standardized clothing. Much as there appears to be a difference between children of rich and poor, at least with this application, we can decrease this distinction more or less. Another aspect of economic income difference among families is that those students who don’t have the chance or fate to be children of rich families, after some time, would begin to question themselves excessively and conclude that why do I have to wear always those clothes while my friends can wear different, colourful clothes every day if it weren’t for school uniform. Thinking, after a time, would affect these students’ success and cause them to feel depressed, annoyed, alienated or shy. Upon seeing their friends wear various clothes, these students would be in the opinion that we aren’t as important in the eyes of our teacher and society as these rich students with colourful dress. As an indirect result of that, we would probably lose those citizens at a very early age. To prevent such a likely chaos, school uniform should be necessary. Not every family will be able to afford such a thing and school uniform is more suitable for families economically.

   Secondly, in order to be sure that education is done perfectly, there needs to be a proper environment. A proper environment calls for some features like peace, silence, and of course security. By means of school uniform, safety of school increases much more, as well. A certain student of any school wears certain school uniforms and carries a symbol, emblem of that school ( e.g. a badge on his/her jacket, tie or vest). If it did not occur so, some people who weren’t students would maybe want to enter the school garden to damage the students. This would decrease the quality of education and break down the education atmosphere. Schools’ security is provided with determining the students’ appearance. When school uniform is abolished, the safety of school will decrease and so will the quality of education. Apart from school safety, thanks to school uniforms, safety of school buses ( okul servisi) is secured, too. School bus is a vehicle that is responsible for transportation of students and these vehicles are to have only certain students who are differentiated from their peers by their school uniform. This generally happens is big cities, like Istanbul, Ankara rather than small ones or villages. Security, in the general view, is a big job to achieve in Turkey and without school uniform, it would be more difficult to be sure that a school is safe enough for every family so send their children to these places with ease.

    Thirdly, school uniform is important for teaching the students from early years that discipline is an significant term that needs gaining as very soon as possible. At approximately ages of 6 or 7, students are urged to wear a standard uniform, which indicates that school uniform is an indicator of discipline. Teachers are responsible for reining and regulating students’ clothing. Being disciplinary and knowing how important it is in one’s life from cradle to grave will fulfil students’ competence. In addition, in state bureaucracy, discipline and order are the 2 necessarily attributes without which one could not make his/her voice be heard. As George Washington, who was the first President of United States (1789-1797), the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, and one the Founding Fathers of the United States( from Wikipedia), defines the purpose of education: “ A primary object should be the education of our youth in the science of government. In a republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important. And what duty[is] more pressing than communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of the country?”( Quotes about Education, page 3,para.12,www.goodreads.com). We can conclude and notice from what G. Washington says that disciplinary youth and new generation is our first desire from education. In the same way, school uniform is a mainstream meronymy of teaching discipline to the youth throughout education process.

    As for the criticism against school uniform, some can argue that school uniform narrows students’ horizon and dictates them how to wear and act. Moreover, there can be those who claim that school uniform creates frightened, thoughtless, dogmatic, unquestioning people. However, this can not be said that one person can totally agree with them. School uniform is just related to a person’s physical appearance. School uniform, rather than making children insensitive and stagnant, teaches them to be social more bravely. Students can try to be friends with all their friends regardless of socioeconomic status, which is enabled by mostly school uniform. School uniform does not and should not limit students’ point of view. They can question everything and also school uniform itself without being under any pressure. Anyway, they are sure to come to the conclusion that there should be a standard clothing ( that is, school uniform). Another benefit is that school uniform gives students to be equal and respectful. School uniform lessens at least this gap partly.

   All in all, school uniform is an inevitable one for education as yet, and it is like speed for cheetah. It should be applied to increase education’s quality. After all, we can learn about another definition of education from Iris Murdoch, an Irish-born British author and philosopher. She says that “education does not make you happy, nor does freedom. We don’t become happy just because we’re free, if we are. Or because we’ve been educated, if we have. But because education may be the means by which we realize we are happy. It opens our eyes, our ears, tells us where delights are lurking, convinces us that there is only one freedom of any importance whatsoever, that of the mind and gives us the assurance, the confidence to walk the path our mind.”. That is to say, should freedom mean that one is educated, then there can be no one more educated than animals.




                                            REFERENCES



Hiç yorum yok:

Yorum Gönder