13 Mayıs 2014 Salı

                                                   FOOTBALL

Football is a team sport that is played on the grass ground with 2 teams, each of which is
composed of 11 players. This definition is the  one that comes to most people’s mind in the
world genereally.However, the definition of football ,in its general meaning, alludes to
something different. As Wikipedia suggests that ” football refers to a number of sports which
range from American football, Australian rules football to Canadian football ,Gaelic
football, rugby-style football. Soccer is also used instead of  football. The concept of modern
football was coined in Great Britain,  as a resut of which The English are called ‘founder of
football and also one of  the best nations that play it ’. It is  almost certain that even prior
to the foundation of modern football in England in 18th and 19th centuries, there are historical
evidences supporting the idea that football has been as old as human history.Another aspect
of the term football,that is when someone spells football in an ordinary place,indeed it covers
all the  world.Every year,in most  countries,there are football tournaments which are held with
the permission of the governments .Some of the most known football leagues are Champions
League,UEFA Championship League,FIFA World Cup and so on.Football has become such a
powerful area in terms of the amount of money invested on it that some football clubs,like
Real Madrid, Barcelona,are richer than some poor countries.There are even some
footballers that gain highly huge  amount of money like, Cristiano Ronaldo,Gareth Bale or L.
Messi. Football is believed to be the most  popular and well-known sport up to now. There are
football stadiums,football schools that are structured in the best places of big cities like Camp
Nou in Barcelona,Wembley Stadium in London,Santiago Bernabeu in Madrid etc. I  also love
playing football with my friends or even alone.Football is a lifestyle for me without which I
would certainly feel  depressed and excluded.Since my childhood,I have always tried to play
it whenever it is suitable,yet some people without being aware make it  be known as a
irritating sport,because some uneducated people can try  to give political messages via
football or make racism against people.These are bad things that are not accepted by
anyone. Still, I strongly believe that despite bad people and their works, football has a
responsibility of gathering people from all around the world to be in contact and respect each
other.It is played by all kinds of people regardless or their sex, age, nation etc. I think it
should be so, at least.
.


Yasin ALTUN

2023620

8 Mayıs 2014 Perşembe

acaip yoruldum ama oldu sanırsam

                                        SCHOOL UNIFORM: NECESSARY OR NOT?

      In Turkish Education System, there have been a lot of changes throughout its history   from 1924 to today, 2014. These changes can range from laws regulating the concept ”education” in general to teacher appointment, schooling, school material and so on. Education, according to universal acceptance, is knowing how to reach what one needs to know. In Turkey, authorities have always been in research of redefining this description and comprehending it properly. While doing so, they have also shaped the profile of a student in terms of how to wear at school. This is legalized by Turkish Grand National Assembly, which commands that every student should what The Education Ministry wants. As stated in the Ministry’s Regulations Booklet, under the headline “Regulations about clothes of students of schools connected to National Education Ministry (p.1, 2012), students can not wear any political emblem, carry any racist, discriminating object etc. Therefore, school uniform is much more useful when compared to other options (e.g. free wearing) thanks to its being applicable and acceptable.

    First of all, standardizing a school uniform contributes to both family’s budget and society’s point of money. In Turkey, which is regarded as developing country no matter how its institutions and statesmen say that we are among the most developed 20 countries all around the world, it is clear that there is a huge income inequality among people. While one can earn around 15,000 TL per month, some other people are forced to work under bad conditions and paid just 800 or 900 TL. Here happens to be an interesting data. In our country, Turkey, hunger limit is determined to be 1,169 TL (according to, March calculations). This inequality can be observed in many areas and also in education system. To lessen this huge gap to some extent, a standard school uniform is accepted. Families with lower income than this hunger limit and those with much more income than hunger limit are obliged to make their children wear the same in state schools to be able to go to them. This unity of wearing enables families to profit more both economically and psychologically. They do not have to buy new clothes ( like different colours or kinds of jacket, pants or shirts.). There is a common uniform that every student, regardless of his/her family income or socioeconomic status, has to wear. In addition, students can manage to diminish the totally wrong acceptance that rich students become friends with the rich or vice versa. This misconception can be destroyed, to some extent, by means of this standardized clothing. Much as there appears to be a difference between children of rich and poor, at least with this application, we can decrease this distinction more or less. Another aspect of economic income difference among families is that those students who don’t have the chance or fate to be children of rich families, after some time, would begin to question themselves excessively and conclude that why do I have to wear always those clothes while my friends can wear different, colourful clothes every day if it weren’t for school uniform. Thinking, after a time, would affect these students’ success and cause them to feel depressed, annoyed, alienated or shy. Upon seeing their friends wear various clothes, these students would be in the opinion that we aren’t as important in the eyes of our teacher and society as these rich students with colourful dress. As an indirect result of that, we would probably lose those citizens at a very early age. To prevent such a likely chaos, school uniform should be necessary. Not every family will be able to afford such a thing and school uniform is more suitable for families economically.

   Secondly, in order to be sure that education is done perfectly, there needs to be a proper environment. A proper environment calls for some features like peace, silence, and of course security. By means of school uniform, safety of school increases much more, as well. A certain student of any school wears certain school uniforms and carries a symbol, emblem of that school ( e.g. a badge on his/her jacket, tie or vest). If it did not occur so, some people who weren’t students would maybe want to enter the school garden to damage the students. This would decrease the quality of education and break down the education atmosphere. Schools’ security is provided with determining the students’ appearance. When school uniform is abolished, the safety of school will decrease and so will the quality of education. Apart from school safety, thanks to school uniforms, safety of school buses ( okul servisi) is secured, too. School bus is a vehicle that is responsible for transportation of students and these vehicles are to have only certain students who are differentiated from their peers by their school uniform. This generally happens is big cities, like Istanbul, Ankara rather than small ones or villages. Security, in the general view, is a big job to achieve in Turkey and without school uniform, it would be more difficult to be sure that a school is safe enough for every family so send their children to these places with ease.

    Thirdly, school uniform is important for teaching the students from early years that discipline is an significant term that needs gaining as very soon as possible. At approximately ages of 6 or 7, students are urged to wear a standard uniform, which indicates that school uniform is an indicator of discipline. Teachers are responsible for reining and regulating students’ clothing. Being disciplinary and knowing how important it is in one’s life from cradle to grave will fulfil students’ competence. In addition, in state bureaucracy, discipline and order are the 2 necessarily attributes without which one could not make his/her voice be heard. As George Washington, who was the first President of United States (1789-1797), the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, and one the Founding Fathers of the United States( from Wikipedia), defines the purpose of education: “ A primary object should be the education of our youth in the science of government. In a republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important. And what duty[is] more pressing than communicating it to those who are to be the future guardians of the liberties of the country?”( Quotes about Education, page 3,para.12,www.goodreads.com). We can conclude and notice from what G. Washington says that disciplinary youth and new generation is our first desire from education. In the same way, school uniform is a mainstream meronymy of teaching discipline to the youth throughout education process.

    As for the criticism against school uniform, some can argue that school uniform narrows students’ horizon and dictates them how to wear and act. Moreover, there can be those who claim that school uniform creates frightened, thoughtless, dogmatic, unquestioning people. However, this can not be said that one person can totally agree with them. School uniform is just related to a person’s physical appearance. School uniform, rather than making children insensitive and stagnant, teaches them to be social more bravely. Students can try to be friends with all their friends regardless of socioeconomic status, which is enabled by mostly school uniform. School uniform does not and should not limit students’ point of view. They can question everything and also school uniform itself without being under any pressure. Anyway, they are sure to come to the conclusion that there should be a standard clothing ( that is, school uniform). Another benefit is that school uniform gives students to be equal and respectful. School uniform lessens at least this gap partly.

   All in all, school uniform is an inevitable one for education as yet, and it is like speed for cheetah. It should be applied to increase education’s quality. After all, we can learn about another definition of education from Iris Murdoch, an Irish-born British author and philosopher. She says that “education does not make you happy, nor does freedom. We don’t become happy just because we’re free, if we are. Or because we’ve been educated, if we have. But because education may be the means by which we realize we are happy. It opens our eyes, our ears, tells us where delights are lurking, convinces us that there is only one freedom of any importance whatsoever, that of the mind and gives us the assurance, the confidence to walk the path our mind.”. That is to say, should freedom mean that one is educated, then there can be no one more educated than animals.




                                            REFERENCES



3 Mayıs 2014 Cumartesi

                                                         OUTLINE

Thesis Statement: Free Clothig Application can not be so useful for the society as it seems to be because of its misunderstanding and misintertpreting.
1)Counter Argument&Refutation
Counter Argument 1:Allowing students to make a decision on what they can wear at school is an inevitable step for freedom and self-determination.
     A. provides students with democratic values
     B. gives students the chance to be individuals
Refutation: School Uniform does not restrict the students’ thinking at all, but rather this application is just related to person’s physical appearance to some extent.
A.    enables students to be social more bravely.
B.     teaches them how to be equal and respectful

Counter Argument 2: Students are able to act more freely and wear whatever they want without being under the pressure of anyone or anything.
A.    feeling limitless to wear everything contributes to students’ mentally and intellectually development
B.     expressing themselves with the clothes they prefer best is an indirect help to identifying the student.

Refutation: Because not every family’s income is equal or alike. Rather than resulting in success of many students, it may lead to some students’ failure, on the contrary.
A.    causes students to feel discriminated and alienated in terms of clothes their rich friends can wear.
B.     provokes depression, annoyance, envy, tendency to commit crime and being sick of going to school every day in the end   

Counter Argument 3: Getting rid of monotype wears at school results in students’ pedagogical development and increasing achievement in that students can be more creative and questioning.
A.    encourages them to be pioneers/revolutionary
B.     suggests them they should question everything by basing them on science and mind   

Refutation: That does not show clear enough to prove that wearing freely equips students with more thinking, yet it is obvious there will be security and disciplinary problems.
A.    shows that teachers and school admins can have difficulty in differentiating who is student or not
B.     demonstrates that families may have prejudices against security attendants, saying that they do not do their job properly.
Pro:  uniform(monotype wearing) teaches students how to be disciplinary, obey the rules of the government, and gives them the advice that there is no power over that of the state.
A.    helps to regulate everyday life
B.     informs about laws, regulations of the state system
C.     tells students about hierarchical formation of the state and staffing.



YASIN ALTUN
2023620